Official websites use. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
The present study examined associations among attitudes toward sugar relationships and relevant variables e. We tested cross-sex and cross-linguistic construct equivalence, cross-cultural invariance in sex differences, and the importance of the hypothetical predictors of ASR.
Results partially supported our hypotheses and were consistent with previous theoretical considerations and empirical evidence on human mating. Keywords: Resources for sex, Sugar relationships, Cross-cultural comparison, Human mating. Sex for resources has been common for centuries e.
In a sugar relationship, a man with resources sugar daddy or, less frequently, a woman with resources sugar mama provides material compensation money or other assets for the sexual companionship offered by a partner who is typically younger in age sugar baby or, less frequently, sugar boy ; Nayar, Sagar et al. Mixon proposes an economic approach to sugar relationships, in which the concept of human capital investment explains the relatively high proportion of young female university students enrolled in expensive programs among the users of specialized dating sites.
From a feminist perspective, Cordero points out the importance of negotiating power and agency by prospective partners in a sugar relationship. Other authors focus on the legal and ethical aspects of sugar relationships.
