Ernest Boggess worked at the Waco Center for Youth as an youth counselor aide for troubled children. After engaging in sex at a hotel in another county with Boggess, D. It was also discovered that Boggess had exposed himself to D. Boggess was charged with five counts of sexually assaulting D. A jury found Boggess guilty of all six counts. Boggess contests the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence to support his sexual assault convictions.
We affirm. In two issues, Boggess contends the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to support the five convictions of sexual assault of D. Both issues focus on the credibility of D. A "legal sufficiency of the evidence review does not involve any weighing of favorable and non-favorable evidence. State, 34 S. State, 30 S. Instead, a legal sufficiency review calls upon the reviewing court to view the relevant evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
See also Jackson v. Virginia, U. State, S. She was disobedient toward her family and, because she had been sexually abused, was promiscuous.
Boggess worked the p. Although he was assigned to the boys side of the unit, he had access to the girls side. Boggess s sexual encounters with D. The intensity of the encounters progressed. Boggess exposed himself to D. Next, Boggess had D. She agreed that someone could have walked by and seen her sucking his dick.
When Boggess ejaculated in her mouth, she swallowed it. She knew D. A few moments later, Boggess had D. After this encounter, Boggess would have D.
