You can also add newsletters iflscience. IFLScience needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services.
You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy. Popular wisdom and established evolutionary science hold that the sexes seek fundamentally different relationships: men want short-term, no-strings-attached relationships whereas women value longer-term, loyal partnerships.
The explanation generally comes down to biological differences between men and women. Because women invest more in reproduction than men do โ think pregnancy, morning sickness and stretchmarks โ being picky becomes important because choosing poorly can be costly, even devastating. However, for men, reproduction may only entail a brief sexual liaison and a bit of sperm โ there are potentially no long-term costs.
This calculus has been built into our psychology , many argue. Sorry sweetie, there are too many fish in the sea. Think about it more carefully, though. Where do all the women sleeping with these guys come from?
As theorist Hanna Kokko noted , it takes two to tango. If we go by the numbers, in a group with an equal number of both sexes, it is impossible, on average, for men to have more partners than women. So why do we expect male psychology to be so hellbent on one-night stands? And why, clearly in opposition to this notion, are many men often so devotedly paternal? According to MMT, relationship preferences are expected to follow not simply from these fixed biological propensities, but also to be heavily influenced by partner availability.
