We kindly inform you that, as long as the subject affiliation of our In this case, please broaden your search criteria. If NATO established as a priority to take measures at state level in order to develop resilience against threats, in accordance with the regulations of Article 3 of the Alliance Treaty, EU took into serious debate the option of constituting a European military force. On the other hand, at the Members State level, there was developed an effective cooperation amongst military structures and law enforcement ones.
For example, on the one hand, NATO - a political-military organization - has included cyberspace among its operational areas, considering it a space of battle, besides the three already traditional - air, land and naval. On the other hand, the European Union - a political and economic organization - is more concerned with cyber security and cybercrime, being aware that networking is essential to maintaining the online economy and ensuring the prosperity of its states and citizens.
Also, at the level of Romania, a series of initiatives have been launched that target the so sensitive digital space. In the present paper, without pretending to have an exhaustive approach, we wish to present the current conceptual framework of cyber security at the Euro-Atlantic, European and national levels and, very briefly, some converging initiatives in the field.
The lack of managing these issues may give rise to and exacerbate extremist and xenophobic attitudes; currently, stereotyping the general immigration issues is a subject on nationalistic and separatist political agendas.
In this context, the aim of this paper is to clarify some of the most widespread prejudices formulated at the level of common sense to the alleged threat to Europe represented by the flow of refugees, by comparing statistical data published by specialized international organizations, in order to avoid slipping into the trap of hatred and discrimination.
